An Analysis Of Three Different Wars

War has been a prevailing subject throughout the centuries of human being. Civilizations have been destroyed, rebuilt and restructured as a direct consequence. Oftentimes, leaders communicate basic and common justifications to pay war against other states: economic and moral/ideological differences to call a few. Yet, an analysis of three specific wars, WWII, the Cold war and the war in Iraq/Afghanistan, will assist to show that with each war differences do be.

If the state can be seen as an entity that embodies as its whole the really spirit of the general human mentality, the encompassed personality of its peoples, so economic sciences is a ocular measuring of accomplishment. This opportunism is a large portion of non merely strength, but besides pure endurance. The power that a state wields is derived from its wealth. Therefore the deductions as to the possible cause of why a state either makes additions or losingss from its wars, ideological or direct, are great in footings of understanding what wars are deserving set abouting for a state. It is lucky that the consequences of the three wars in footings of economic sciences can be slightly mensural and understood.

While it is true that America, like likely all states, will seek economic opportunism in footings of make up one’s minding why to pay a war, it is really the differences in the existent economic wages that may specify the value of the war to the state. Even though America did non straight take part with armed forces in WWII until 1941, the war attempt had already begun prior to World War II ( WWII ) . The state had already mobilized for war and was already providing Britain and its Alliess with war stuffs. This big displacement in industry and employment allowed for America to thrive from WWII.

America is by and large opposed to different ideological constructions than that of our ain democratic rules. The farther removed a state is from democracy, the greater America ‘s reaction and feelings of fright and resistance. This logical thinking was expressed to warrant our engagement in the Cold War towards communism ( Cold War ; Soviet Union ) , WWII towards Totalitarianism/ Fascism ( WWII ; Germany and Italy ) and the war in Iraq/Afghanistan ( Totalitarianism ; Middle Eastern part ) .

The similarity between how America entered the three wars is of import because it reveals the underlying yarn that ties the American mental consciousness when it approaches war. In all the three wars, America did non assail unless threatened. Even though it may be pitching up for war, America did non genuinely enter WWII it until the onslaught on Pearl Harbor had transpired. Similarly, it besides did n’t come in Afghanistan until the onslaught on American dirt onslaught during 9/11. Although non as straight provoked, America entered Vietnam to forestall what they thought was the Domino consequence of state after state going Communist. It becomes obvious from these instances that it is of import to hold the people behind you when you try to originate a war, and the best manner to acquire them behind you is the menace of an terminal to their manner of life.

In the instance of these wars, the states involved use legion techniques to seek to derive the support of its citizens such as pride in their state and fright of their enemy. In either instance, patriotism has been used throughout history and these wars are no exclusion to the regulation. To keep a war besides requires the support of the people and typically a few of import factors play into the likeliness of support and these include the length of service of the war, the end of the war, and how successfully the war is continuing. Since the authorities merely needs to hold people back up these wars, it comes as no surprise when propaganda is used when truth fails. In the instance of the Afghanistan/Iraq war and the Vietnam War, for illustration, all three are used to great consequence in combination with nationalist propaganda.

When come ining Afghanistan/Iraq and Vietnam, it was said that the wars would be won rapidly and resolutely and in both instances we had something genuinely dismaying to fear. Respectively, either it would be the WMD ‘s that would destruct us, or the mass sums of scaring Communist states that would make it. It is interesting to observe that there was besides no cogent evidence of either of these two things after the fact. It is possible that the grounds behind the wars were something else beside simple defence of the American manner. It is non every bit of import as the outlook that allowed the wars to go on.

However, if these three wars are examined more closely we can get down to notice obvious differences. The Cold War was a technological war that many believe originate post World War II. The struggle arose between allied westernized states, chiefly the United States, and allied communist states, chiefly the Soviet Union. There was much political ill will as this war symbolized our resistance to the spread of communism ; nevertheless, existent warfare ne’er occurred. This differs greatly when compared to World War II, where trench warfare was utilized to the maximal capacity to derive control of our aims. In our current War in Iraq/Afghanistan, we continue to utilize signifiers of physical force to accomplish the coveted consequences including airplane work stoppages, on pes combat and so forth.

During the clip frame in which these wars take topographic point, societal agitation frequently settles and strains the states people. Desperate times can do drastic steps to take topographic point. During World War II and our War in Iraq/Afghanistan, race murder has been an unfortunate yet realistic event. In our current war on Afghanistan/Iraq, race murder of Muslims is taking topographic point in the Middle Eastern parts. Muslim extremists who believe in the actual reading of the Koran are intolerant of other spiritual groups within their state and environing parts. Genocide of the Jews in Germany during World War II and environing states was besides prevailing. This was non an issue for the states involved in the Cold War. Ultimately, race murder can be seen as a signifier of control. Genocide besides seems to hold a strong correlativity with war in general. This was a tactic that proved really effectual to unify a state forcibly, but it was non used in all three wars discussed.

If these three wars are examined more closely we can get down to notice obvious differences. The Cold War was a technological war that many believe originate post World War II. The struggle arose between allied westernized states, chiefly the United States, and allied communist states, chiefly the Soviet Union. There was much political ill will as this war symbolized our resistance to the spread of communism. Large sums of money were invested to construct up atomic arms on both the Communist and capitalist sides during the war ; nevertheless, existent warfare ne’er occurred. This differs greatly when compared to World War II, where trench warfare was utilized to the maximal capacity to derive control of our aims. In our current War in Iraq/Afghanistan, we continue to utilize signifiers of physical force to accomplish the coveted consequences including airplane work stoppages, manus to manus combat, to a great extent armed conflict armored combat vehicles and so forth.

Even though engineering alterations and the conflicts may take topographic point in different terrains with different sorts of combat, the implicit in subject becomes clear. It is about the outlook of the people in the state. Engaging a war without holding the people on your side is bound to acquire more and more hard and likely neglect if prolonged. All three wars relied on a use of people ‘s Black Marias and heads in order to convert them to take part and keep the war. It may take one magnetic leader stating people what they want to hear in the right minute such as Adolf Hitler or any leader. It does n’t take a dictator or a president to pay war ; it merely takes a decently motivated group of people contending for thoughts. Possibly out of fright or ego saving, or possibly out of patriotism or pride. In the three instances above, America is non much different from any other state in that regard. Possibly though, if people are made cognizant of the techniques of governmental persuasion every bit good as cognizing the history of similar wars and state of affairss, so at least they can more accurately make up one’s mind such an of import determination of war alternatively of merely being sheep.