Communications analysis: Skyfall (2012)

The old and new subject manifests non merely inSkyfall( 2012, directed by Sam Mendes ) ’s cliche landmark iconography but besides in its characters viz. Bond, Q and Mallory. As such, this essay will look atSkyfallthrough macro and micro-analysis on how the binary resistance of old and new is represented in the characters’ actions or addresss. My overall statement is about the struggles between the old and new subject encapsulated by characters inSkyfalland that these antagonists are finally resolved. Representation as Hall ( 1997 ) postulates is the production of intending through linguistic communication, which is a system of marks made up of form and signified. In this context, form is the word ‘London’ and signified are Bond and the characters inSkyfall. Mendes intentionally constructs Bond’s vocalization that his state as England ( Chapman, 2005 ) makes him visually associated to London, the capital of England. Therefore, characters inSkyfallcan be interpreted as representations of London.

“London as an imperial metropolis and as a metropolis of young person culture” ( Brunsdon, 2007 ) denotes that London itself is a topographic point populated by both the old and immature ( new ) . Therefore, it does non come as a surprise that London is a metropolis where coevals spread exists. The struggle between Bond, an older character and Q, a younger and new character is conspicuous in their first brush at the National Gallery. When doing mention toThe Fighting Temeraire, Q’s melancholy statement is dismissed by Bond’s tactless comment. Bond farther inquiries Q’s competency as a quartermaster by stating that he “still has spots” in which Q rebukes him that “age is no warrant of efficiency” . Besides, clangs between Bond and Q besides lie in their personality and the construct of maleness. Chemical bond is presented as an older, stoic hunk ( Hoa, 2012 ) who overpowers his challengers with physical force while Q is vernal and geeky who outsmarts his opposition via technological agencies. As Bond is portrayed as fearless and dare, Q conversely is afraid of winging. This shows that the older coevals is slightly conforming to the typical hypermasculinity ( Tremonte & A ; Racioppi, 2009 ) while the new immature fellow perverts from the stereotyped construct.

The duality between old and new besides exists in the values incarnated by characters. Quoting Hoa ( 2012 ) ’s impression of the refusal to allow travel, old character like Bond palpably declines to “stay dead” despite his deteriorating physical status has put him in a head-on confrontation with the new character, Mallory. It is deserving observing that Mallory is a representation of both the new and old. However, in this context, I am analyzing Mallory as an incarnation of the “new” . His averment “it’s a immature man’s game” implies his surrender to field work by leting the immature to make the occupation while the old takes up desk occupation. Bond’s “hire me or fire me” suggests his diamond in functioning his state as an operative contradicts with Mallory’s modus operandi. The mutual exclusiveness between Mallory and Bond is obviously displayed when Bond addresses him as a administrative official while Mallory is doubting of Bond’s ability as a field agent. The opposing position between these two characters is an avowal of the struggle between the old and new inSkyfall.

However, the counter relationships between the old ( Bond ) and new ( Q and Mallory ) finally end amicably. In the context of Q and Bond, their animus subsides when Q recognises the necessity of holding Bond around to “pull the trigger” one time in a piece. Bond’s misanthropic “brave new world” averment besides signifies that he has accepted that the universe has changed whereby the young’s professional ethos is more about manner. This is attributed to Q’s remark that a gun is more of a “personal statement instead than a killing machine” and besides his demand for Bond to “return the equipment in one piece” . Further down the plot line, Bond requires Q’s aid in covering with Silva. The cooperation between these two demonstrates how each character irrespective of their unsimilarities play important function in back uping one another in the thick of convulsion to support their state. In short, the dialogue between the old and new enables the continuance of societal order ( Pilcher, 1994 ) .

Meanwhile, Mallory and Bond’s ill will diminishes the minute Mallory picks up a gun and battles aboard Bond in Westminster, a bureaucratic disposal topographic point. Mallory’s action signifies him returning back to his former individuality as a soldier and impermanent abandon his administrative official place. Even the old ought to come out to the field to support the state is precisely what Bond is positioning himself throughout the movie. Mallory’s action conforms to Bond’s that in the face of terrorist act, the political place of a individual is disregarded as the sense of nationalism to protect the state comes foremost. As significance alterations over clip ( Hall, 1997 ) , so does a character. Towards the terminal of the movie, Mallory consents to Q helping Bond implies that he is a various character who adapts harmonizing to state of affairs, therefore typifyingSkyfall’s “old Canis familiaris, new tricks” one-liner. The scene where Mallory takes over M’s occupation at his predecessor’s office exemplifies Ellis ( 2003 ) ’s “new universe but old habits” by keeping M’s modus operandi as he retains Bond in MI6. Likewise, Bond acknowledges Mallory by turn toing him as “M” and set about his up-coming undertakings “with pleasure” . It is important that the image ofThe Fighting Temerairecentred at the terminal of the movie represents Bond and Mallory, connotes the two renewed characters are one time once more puting out sailing into the new universe.

The apposition of characters picturing the old and new subject inSkyfallreinforces the dominant political orientation that the new can non replace the old and frailty versa. Alternatively both sides should appreciate each other’s good qualities, via media and intermix in to show a modern-day movie where the old accepts the new and the new connects with the old. Based on Armstrong ( 2012 ) ’s illation thatSkyfallis about the yesteryear ( old ) and the hereafter ( new ) , this essay concludes that the Bond’s bequest will populate on through the new coevals.


Armstrong, J. ( 2012 ) . Britain is Back – Skyfall Heralds a Tax return to Great Britishness.Huffington Post.[ Online ] 1stNovember 2012. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed: 23rdJune 2014 ] .

Brunsdon, C. ( 2007 ) .London in Cinema: The Cinematic City Since 1945. London: British Film Institute.

Chapman, J. ( 2005 ) .Chemical bond and Britishness.In Comentale, E.P. , Watt, S. & A ; Willman, S. ( explosive detection systems. ) .Ian Fleming and James Bond: The Cultural Politicss of 007.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ellis, K. ( 2003 ) . New World, Old Habits: Patriarchal Ideology in Star Wars: A New Hope.Australian Screen Education,30, 135-138.

Hall, S. ( ed. ) . ( 1997 ) .Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.London: Open University.

Hoa, J.H.B. ( 2012 ) . “That which we are, we are” : Hong Kong and Post-Colonial Identity in Skyfall.Situations: Cultural Surveies in The Asiatic Context, 6, 1-11.

Lacey, N. ( ed. ) . ( 2009 ) .Image And Representation: Cardinal Concepts In Media Studies. London: Routledge.

Pilcher, J. ( 1994 ) . Mannheim’s sociology of coevalss: an undervalued bequest.Bureau of justice statistics, 45:3, 481-495.

Tremonte C.M. & A ; Racioppi, L. ( 2009 ) . Body Politicss andCasino Royale: Gender and ( Inter ) national Security. In Linder, C. ( ed. ) .The James Bond Phenomenon: A Critical Reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Skyfall. (2012 ) . Film, directed by Sam Mendes. United Kingdom, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.