Comparative Impact Assessment On Pakistan And India Economics Essay

Global fiscal crisis begun in September 2008 and the universe economic system started confronting serious jobs. The crisis initiated from US existent estate market and shortly it dispersed really broad. The states most affected by it were largely those with close economic and fiscal ties with the U.S. The magnitude of the impact was so immense that some of the economic experts believe it to be greater than that of 1930 ‘s great depression. The spread of the crisis was so rapid and multi-dimensional that its impact was expected to be non merely on the economic systems of the states but besides on the societal facets. For case, unemployment rate was multiplied many times in this period because of the impact of fiscal crisis on existent economic system. The jutting growing rates of the economic sciences, particularly of developing states, were no longer relevant hence they were revised. Harmonizing to the estimations of World Bank, the expected growing rate of developing states was revised and was reduced by 1.9 points i.e. it was reduced to 4.5 % from 6.4 % . Estimates besides suggested that economic systems of the developed states would shrivel by 0.1 % during 2010.

Bing one of the emerging fiscal sectors, Pakistan was comparatively less affected by the crisis. Limited linkages with the international markets assured that there was no direct impact of crisis on fiscal sector. The existent sector, nevertheless, was affected by this crisis to some extent. The chief channel of transmittal had been through trade ; specifically exports, which were declined due to decrease in international import demand. The impact was besides felt on capital influxs, peculiarly private 1s like remittals and less significantly on foreign direct investing.

India on the other manus besides performed good as the literature says ( Bhaskaran. M et al 2010 ) . During the crisis Indian economic system performed truly good. Furthermore, the economic system is expected to execute better in close hereafter despite the challenges of lifting oil monetary values and clime. The ground for this success of Indian economic system is non merely its comparatively lower exposure to international trade but the chief grounds are being economic and fiscal reforms that took topographic point in the state in recent yesteryear for illustration, beef uping of banking sector. These factors make Indian economic system prone to external dazes atleast to the extent that recovery from it is comparatively easy.

Since it has been more than 2 old ages since the crisis evolved, the literature is turning in footings of its impacts and policy steps. The decisions nevertheless are no common. Some documents argue that a peculiar economic system was unaffected by the crisis while others argue that it was non. Therefore, in this paper we will try to analyse the impact of fiscal crisis on Pakistan and India in visible radiation of bing literature and available informations. Through empirical analysis we will try to back up our decision from literature reappraisal.

Channelss of Transmission

The figure above presents the possible transmittal of fiscal crisis towards the GDP of state. Fiscal crisis are expected to impact exports, remittals and monetary values negatively. Worsening exports means lower footings of trade which hampers economic growing. Lower remittals means lower domestic investings and low demand of receiver families which translates itself into GDP. Last, fiscal crisis lowers trade good monetary values in fiscal markets which leads to big losingss to investors.

Literature Review

This subdivision provides really brief literature reappraisal of selected documents on impact on fiscal crisis on Pakistan and India individually. In the concluding version of the undertaking, we wish to unify literature of both states to give comparative overview.


Shaikh et Al ( 2009 ) investigated the impact of economic recession on hapless in Pakistan utilizing sample of 2000 respondents from Sindh state. The consequences revealed that poorness in the part increased by 15 per centum during the period of crisis. Even in some instances people could non hold equal measure of nutrient. More specifically, buying power of the persons has been declined by 10 % during the period. They besides reported that apart from its economic impacts, crisis besides had important psychological effects on the persons because of the guesss and high uncertainness. They besides reported that authorities policies to extenuate the impact were non really effectual because of the high rates of unemployment.

Harmonizing to Saleem ( 2009 ) prior to the crisis, Pakistan was already confronting macroeconomic instabilities because of the spike in international petroleum oil monetary values and high rising prices rates which was further stimulated by the planetary fiscal crisis. Pakistan faced affects of fiscal crisis chiefly because of its close ties with US. US is the major finish of Pakistan ‘s exports which histories for 30 % of Pakistan ‘s entire exports. Furthermore, approximately 30 % of the FDI in Pakistan comes from US which means the economic emphasis in the US can easy translated to Pakistan ‘s economic system because of the high grade of dependance.

Similarly, Musleh ud Din ( 2009 ) besides explained that impact of the crisis in Pakistan was because of the economic instabilities prior to the crisis. Because of the nerve-racking initial conditions, there were limited options for macroeconomic accommodations. These initial conditions provided small room for macroeconomic accommodations necessary to cover with the planetary fiscal crisis. For illustration, Pakistan was following tight pecuniary policy because of the high rising prices rate prior to the crisis. After crisis, Pakistan borrowed from IMF, the conditions of which forced it to go on the tight pecuniary policy which lead to rapid autumn in growing and increase in unemployment and poorness. However, to assist the stabilisation procedure, oil monetary values fell and remittals were increased significantly which harmonizing to the writer may be a short term phenomena and remittals are more likely to be fallen in close hereafter largely because of the economic conditions in the Gulf.

Ali. M ( 2009 ) , observed that the operating environment of the fiscal sector in Pakistan experienced important impairment in 2007 and 2008, due to a meeting of factors emanating from both the domestic and international economic and fiscal developments. With a booming banking sector, progressively resilient to a broad assortment of dazes, increasing but still comparatively less correlativity of domestic fiscal markets with planetary fiscal developments, a proactive and argus-eyed regulative environment, and most significantly, no direct exposure to securitized instruments, hazards to fiscal stableness were mostly contained and good managed as the crisis unfolded and impacted the fiscal sectors in advanced economic systems. Commodity Prices & A ; Trade: An unprecedented hiking in international trade good monetary values wreaked mayhem on Pakistan ‘s external sector during 2007-08, with the current history widening significantly. However, in the aftermath of a decrease in planetary demand and the attendant lessening in trade good monetary values, the import measure has reduced significantly, diminishing the current history shortage. A cardinal loss to developing states during the current crisis has been a lessening in exports as demand from advanced economic systems contracts. Pakistan has witnessed a lag in exports, but this decrease stands apart from that witnessed by other Asiatic economic systems for two grounds. First, the autumn in exports is partially due to a autumn in domestic productiveness and it is difficult to separate between the impact of the crisis and internal factors on exports. Second, the autumn in imports has outpaced the autumn in exports, holding a positive consequence on the trade balance. Bing an unfastened and extremely import dependent economic system, Pakistan has been hit badly by the rush in planetary trade good monetary values whose impact magnified as the oil and other strategic import monetary values rose. This led non merely to an unprecedented rise in inflationary force per unit areas but besides made balance of payments place unsustainable. The month-on-month headline CPI rising prices reached every bit high as 25.3 per centum by August 2008 compared to 6.5 per centum in August 2007. The current history shortage which was 4.8 per centum of GDP in FY07, about doubled to 8.6 per centum of GDP in FY08.

Butt. N. A ( 2009 ) stated that the recent period of economic growing of Pakistan was based on a combination with political instability, led to a rapid in rising prices, a spike in the trade and current history shortages, and a devaluation of the Pakistani rupee. Although planetary fuel and nutrient monetary values are on the diminution, the U.S fiscal crisis has precipitated a perchance extended planetary recession. For Pakistan, a planetary recession will probably cut down demand for its exports, inward FDI flows and abroad remittent. Official Pakistan estimations for inward foreign direct investing in 2009 reportedly show a diminution of over 32 % when compared ran into jobs in 2008. Real GDP growing, which had been averaging above 7 % per twelvemonth since financial twelvemonth 2000/2001, declined to 5.8 % in financial twelvemonth 2007/2008 and is expected to worsen to 2.5 % in financial twelvemonth 2008/2009.

Usman. M ( 2009 ) described the relationship between capital flows and workers ‘ remittals. A beleaguered international economic environment has held back Foreign Investment as it posted a diminution of 47.5 per cent during the first 10 months of 2008-09 compared to the corresponding period of the old year.19 Some Asiatic economic systems have witnessed an awaited autumn in workers ‘ remittals as unemployment grew in advanced host economic systems. However, workers ‘ remittals to Pakistan remained vigorous and unaffected by the crisis, numbering US $ 6.36 billion in July-April 2008-09 as against US $ 5.32 billion in the corresponding period last twelvemonth, a rise of 19.5 per cent.

Ali. A ( 2009 ) reported that Pakistani exports may be hit badly due to recession in the Western universe. The United State and the European Union are the major finishs of Pakistani exports. Both are severely hit by the current fiscal crisis. The immense unemployment will ensue in lessened buying power of the people in these states, which will certainly impact exports from all the states including Pakistan. Pakistan may, hence, face jobs in the exports sector as about 54 per cent of the state ‘s exports go to U.S. and European states. The authorities of Pakistan routinely spends some $ 26 billion a twelvemonth based on expected grosss of around $ 20 billion, incurring a budget shortage of over 7 per cent of GDP. On the trade forepart, accrued exports barely of all time cross the $ 20-billion twelvemonth grade, but imports end up transcending $ 35 billion ; a trade shortage in surplus of $ 15 billion a twelvemonth and a current history shortage of over $ 1 billion a month. Approximately half of the extra goods import measure in fiscal twelvemonth 2008 came from high fuel monetary values in the international market that peaked in July 2008. That led to an addition in both rising prices and current history shortage. Oil imports increased by 43 per cent in the twelvemonth 2007-08, and reached $ 10.5 billion. That was the major cause of the declining trade shortage, which soared by 57.4 per centum to $ 15.3 billion, even though the one-year export mark of $ 19.2 billion was exceeded. Furthermore, in the first four months of the fiscal twelvemonth 2009 ( July-October 2008 ) , a similar tendency continued. The trade shortage reached US $ 7.55 billion against US $ 5.47 billion in the same period the old twelvemonth, a 37 per cent addition. Furthermore, net influxs reduced well, ensuing in about a doubling of the current history shortage to $ 5.95 billion from $ 2.99 billion over the same period the old twelvemonth. The figures for the period July 2008 to January 2009 in this respect are even more distressing in the position of portfolio investing. A sum of $ 321.4 million left the state under this caput which may partially be explained by the planetary fiscal crisis and partially by the loss of assurance in the Pakistan economic system that appears to prevail to this twenty-four hours. The Karachi Stock Exchange ( KSE ) has been in a free autumn from the twelvemonth high of 15,000 points to 9,200 in three months, coercing the authorities to step in by puting a floor and suggesting a bailout program. That was due to the planetary economic meltdown and insecurity in the state which increased investor ‘s anxiousness, during the period July-December 2008. These glooming events have had an inauspicious impact on the public presentation of Pakistan ‘s equity market. Harmonizing to estimations of the State Bank of Pakistan, foreign investing in the Karachi Stock Exchange stands at around $ 500 million. Other estimations put foreign investing at around 20 per cent of the entire free float. During 2006-2007, foreign investors were actively puting in KSE-listed securities. However, the twelvemonth 2008 was a suffering 1 for the KSE. The benchmark KSE has undergone a crisp reversal in the lifting tendency of its taking KSE-100 index. The state ‘s economic system to a great extent relies on remittals sent by the more than three million abroad Pakistanis in Europe, the Middle East and the U.S. It is like a gold mine for Pakistan, playing a cardinal function for stableness in the balance of payments and extenuating unemployment jobs. These abroad Pakistani direct $ 7 billion a twelvemonth, more than the loans the state received from foreign states. Harmonizing to the ministry of finance, the flow of remittals has remained robust during the last seven months of the financial twelvemonth 2009 despite the planetary economic meltdown. The oil-rich states along with the United States accounted for more than three-fourth of the remittals during the first seven months of the current financial twelvemonth 2008-2010. The remittals sent by these communities are non merely helpful in poorness decrease in Pakistan but besides in diminishing budgetary shortages.


Harmonizing to Kumar et Al ( 2009 ) , since Indian economic system is linked with the universe, it faced the impacts of planetary fiscal. Despite the fact that Indian banking sector was non straight affected greatly by the crisis, the economic system was affected by three different channels viz. ; fiscal markets, trade flows, and exchange rates. The analysis of indirect impacts revealed that Indian banking sector was greatly affected by fiscal crisis. Because of the external market liquidness squeezing, Indian Bankss were forced to switch their recognition demand from external to the domestic beginnings which lead to unnatural addition in the loaning rates. Similarly, FDI, remittals and exports, all being important for economic development, faced inauspicious impacts during the crisis. Furthermore, Indian rupee came under a batch of force per unit area because of the portfolio investings and foreign exchange demands of Indian enterprisers to replace external adoption from domestic funding.

To back the account of Kumar et Al ( 2009 ) , Rangarajan ( 2009 ) besides explained that Indian banking sector was indirectly influenced by the planetary fiscal crisis. The indirect channels include through trade and through capital flows. There has been a important lessening in Indian exports in the period 2008-09 because of the fiscal crunch in the international market. Besides FDI and portfolio investings from abroad witnessed crisp diminutions. Furthermore, Indian houses besides experienced problem raising money in international market.

Contrary to the position presented above, Stabroek ( 2010 ) argues that during the period of crisis, India was the 2nd fastest turning economic system in the universe with 6 % growing rate in GDP where most of the states faced negative growing. Author argues that India was able to acquire out of fiscal crisis because of its low dependence on international trade and capital flows. India faced crisp diminution in ware exports during the period but exports of services continue to turn. Remittance flows besides witnessed positive growing in the period largely from the Indians in Gulf states.

India has by-and-large been spared of planetary fiscal contagious disease due to the subprime convulsion for a assortment of grounds. India ‘s growing procedure has been mostly domestic demand driven and its trust on foreign nest eggs has remained around 1.5 per cent in recent period. It besides has a really comfy degree of forex militias. The recognition derived functions market is in an embryologic phase ; the originate-to-distribute theoretical account in India is non comparable to the 1s predominating in advanced markets ; there are limitations on investings by occupants in such merchandises issued abroad ; and regulative guidelines on securitisation do non allow immediate net income acknowledgment. Financial stableness in India has been achieved through doggedness of prudential policies which prevent establishments from inordinate hazard pickings, and fiscal markets from going highly volatile and disruptive Mohan, R. ( 2008 ) .

Rajiv. K et Al ( 2009 ) The impact of the planetary crisis has been transmitted to the Indian economic system through three distinguishable channels, viz. , the fiscal sector, exports, and exchange rates. On the fiscal forepart, the Indian banking sector was non excessively exposed to the sub-prime crisis. While exports of both goods and services, still account for merely about 22 per centum of the Indian GDP, their multiplier consequence for economic activity is rather big as the import content is non every bit high as for illustration in the instance of Chinese exports. Therefore, an export slack will convey down GDP growing rate in the approaching twelvemonth. The 3rd transmittal channel is the exchange rate, as the Indian Rupee has come under force per unit area.

In footings of policy response, there is non much room for farther financial policy action as the amalgamate financial shortage of the cardinal and province authoritiess in 2008-09 is already approximately 11 per centum of the GDP. Any farther addition in financial shortage to GDP ratio could ask for a crisp downgrading of India ‘s recognition evaluation and a loss of concern assurance. It is more of import to concentrate policy attending on taking some of the many staying structural constrictions on raising the possible GDP growing rate. Basically this will connote attempts at bettering the investing clime both for domestic and foreign investors ; taking the entry barriers for the entry of corporate investing in instruction and vocational preparation ; bettering the bringing of public goods and services ; and spread outing physical substructure capacities including a major attempt at bettering connectivity in the rural parts.

Sharma. V. K. , ( 2009 ) India have had singular fiscal stableness, non fortunately, but thanks to preemptively and pro actively delivered prudential steps like addition in hazard weights for exposures to commercial existent estate, capital market, venture capital financess and systemically of import non-deposit accepting Non Banking Finance Companies ( NBFCs ) . These pre-crisis prudential regulative steps of Reserve Bank of India represented what now are famously known as ‘countercyclical capital steps ‘ and have been strongly commended for acceptance by assorted recent Working Groups/Committees of international regulators. Indeed, in the wake of the planetary fiscal crisis and ensuing economic recession, these countercyclical capital steps have been rolled back to buffer the inauspicious impact of the crisis to considerable good consequence to the Indian economic system. However, for all the positives about the Indian economic system, the fact still remains that in position of the turning integrating of the Indian economic system and the fiscal system with the remainder of the universe, it can non be the instance that Indian economic system should hold remained unaffected. The Indian economic system was collaterally affected chiefly through two channels: the Capital history and the Trade history. While India continued to see significant net capital influxs, the state of affairs changed for the worse in September/October 2008 in the aftermath of Lehman Brothers ‘ bankruptcy, with significant net capital escapes and this, in combination with widening trade history and current history shortages resulted in the diminution of foreign exchange militias of about USD 60 billion, from USD 316 billion in May 2008 to about USD 255 billion now. The trade shortage widened to USD 120 billion ( 10 % of GDP ) and current history shortage widened to USD 29 billion ( 2.6 % of GDP ) .

The UNDESA information estimations that the figure of India ‘s hapless was 33.6 million higher in 2009 than would hold been the instance if the growing rates of the old ages from 2004 to 2007 had been maintained. In 2009 entirely, an estimated 13.6 million more people in India became hapless or remained in poorness than would hold been the instance at 2008 growing rates. In other words, while a dip from the 8.8 % growing in GDP averaged from 2004-05 to 2006-07 to the 6.7 % estimated for 2008-09 may be nil like the recession faced by the West, its human effects for India were likely worse. The 2.1 % diminution in India ‘s GDP growing rate has efficaciously translated into a 2.8 % addition in the incidence of poorness ( Shrinivasan. R 2010 ) .

Pimple. M. , ( 2009 ) found that in 2008, Growth declined to 7.3 % down from 9.3 % in 2007 and Government estimations for twelvemonth 2009 are for approx 6.5 % to 7.5 % growing rate. But the IMF prognosis is for growing to fall to 5.1 % . Fiscal steps that have been undertaken: Supporting peculiar industries, including labor-intensive and export oriented concerns. In add-on to these steps the authorities undertakes steps to Encouraging investing in substructure and Ensuring liquidness in the fiscal system.

Ratha. D ( 2009 ) noted that despite the fiscal crisis in developed states the remittal to India have increased and reached 52 billion dollar. Some of the factors responsible for a rush in remittal to India in 2008 include: increasing migration to the Gulf and other finishs, a weaker rupee together with widening difference between domestic and international involvement rates, and roar in the existent estate and stock markets ( until mid-2008 ) which created investing chances. An moderation of ordinances and controls and debut of new engineerings and merchandises by Indian and international Bankss and exchange houses in the Gulf’such as direct transportations to bank histories, free bringing of demand bill of exchanges to the receivers, and a turning array of remittance-linked fiscal merchandises ( place loans, common financess etc. ) ‘reduced transportation costs and besides shifted remittal flows to formal banking channels. With the economic crisis in the developed states intensifying from mid-2008 onwards, the ‘safe-haven ‘ factor of reassigning nest eggs to the place state at a clip when international Bankss are non doing good and lodge rates are really low in the finish states contributed to maintaining remittals at the high degrees reached in the early portion of 2008. The depreciation of the Indian Rupee against the US dollar ( after several old ages of grasp ) resulted in a ‘sale consequence ‘ as this made local assets cheaper and even more attractive for migrators.These may hold contributed to a displacement in remittals being sent for ingestion motivations to investing motivations.

Casual Look at Performance of some Indexs

Trade flows


Beginning: economic study of the two states and monthly statistical bulletin

As we can see from the above tabular array the public presentation of export for both Pakistan and India has decreased in 2009 right after the fiscal crisis.

Investing flows

Table2. Foreign directed investing ( in US million $ )


Beginning: Asiatic development mentality 2009

Foreign directed investing ( FDI ) is decreased from 32.327 to 20.7 billion in India, but it increased in Pakistan from 5.026 to 5.078 billion.


Table 3: workers remittal ( In US billion $ )


The remittal earned from workers increased for both Pakistan and India. Precisely, they increased from 30.8 to 43.5 and from 5.49 to 6.45 million USD for India and Pakistan severally.

Tentative Outline



Channelss of Transmission

Literature Review

Empirical Findingss

Policy Responses

The Way Forward


Empirical Methodology

Our analysis is based on two major types of theoretical accounts: a ) we attempt to see the impact of planetary fiscal crisis on India and Pakistan, B ) we besides attempt to see impact of crisis on nucleus economic indexs. we used simple OLS methodological analysis to gauge our coefficients utilizing Gretl.

We use following equations for both states individually

Equation 1:

EM_FSI = ? _1? + ? _2? EM_FSI? _j+ ? ? _3 AM_FSI_i+ ? _t

Where EM_FSI is state specific fiscal emphasis index while AM_FSI is mean of fiscal emphasis index for progress markets. The index J ranges from 1 to t while one scopes from 0 to t.

Equation 2:

GDP = ? _1? + ? _2? EM_FSI? _i+ ? ? _3 X+ ? _t

Where GDP is the existent gross domestic product of state and X is the set of control variables.

Equation 3:

INF = ? _1? + ? _2? EM_FSI? _i+ ? ? _3 X+ ? _t

Where INF is the rising prices rate in the state and X is the set of control variables.

Equation 4:

TR = ? _1? + ? _2? EM_FSI? _i+ ? ? _3 X+ ? _t

Where TR is trade of the state which is the summing up of exports and imports while Ten is the set of control variables.

Equation 5:

REM = ? _1? + ? _2? EM_FSI? _i+ ? ? _3 X+ ? _t

Where REM is remittals sent by subjects populating abroad X is the set of control variables.


We quantify the fiscal emphasis utilizing fiscal emphasis index developed by IMF and used by Ravi Balakrishnan et Al ( 2009 ) . The index is available for both emerging and advanced economic systems. We used norm of indices for advanced economic systems to stand for the beginning of fiscal crisis and used several indices for Pakistan and India.

The Financial Stress Index ( FSI ) is a summing up of five variables to capture recognition conditions in fiscal market sections viz. banking, securities markets, and exchange markets ) . The five constituents of the FSI are the ‘banking-sector beta, ‘ denoted as? , stock market returns, time-varying stock market return volatility, autonomous debt spreads, and an exchange market force per unit area index ( EMPI ) . The selected variables can depict the crisis to good extent and that entirely is the ground for including them in the building of index. It may nevertheless be noted that some other variables can besides be included to better the preciseness and truth of index but writers did non utilize it refering to inaccessibility of informations.

Other statistics are being taken from Reserve Bank of India and State Bank of Pakistan for India and Pakistan severally. The cyclicity of informations is monthly from June 2001 to April 2009. While most of the observations were taken as it is in national currency units, for some variables few transmutations were necessary. We used additive insertion method to fill-in the losing information utilizing STATA 10. We besides converted informations from USD to local currency units wheresoever necessary.

Preliminary Consequences

Using OLS method of appraisal, we found following consequences:

Equation 1:

For India, we found that fiscal emphasis in advanced economic systems translates themselves instantly into the Indian economic system because of high grade of international connection. The lagged consequence of the same variable is besides important but somewhat less than degree signifier.

For Pakistan, the impact of advanced economic systems was seen to be translated after two months. Besides the domestic crisis in old month would take to crisis in following month every bit good because of positive and important relationship.

Equation 2:

For Pakistan, we found that fiscal emphasis in the state translates into GDP after one month. Impact of remittals on gross domestic product was found to be undistinguished while rising prices had positive relationship with GDP which is in line with economic theory.

For India, we found similar consequences in instance of FSI variable but impact of rising prices was found to be undistinguished. Coefficients of both FDI and Exports were found to be positive and important which is once more in line with economic theory.

Equation 3:

For both India and Pakistan, we found positive impact of fiscal emphasis on rising prices. The relationship was nevertheless important for the lagged term which means that the crisis wo n’t interpret instantly to the rising prices.

Equation 4:

For both Pakistan and India we found that crisis negatively affect trade in the state. Since trade variable is summing up of exports and imports, one can believe of different possibilities for the logical thinking of this diminution but most likely this diminution is because of diminution in both exports every bit good as imports.

Equation 5:

For both India and Pakistan we found that fiscal emphasis has negative relationship with remittals. The ground could be the economic state of affairs in the place state of the remittals or the host state. If the conditions are non good in the state from where the remittals were geting, the income of the occupants will worsen and will diminish remittals as a effect. Similarly if the conditions are bad in host state so remittals will once more worsen because of less buying power in the host state.


Faiz.M.Shaikh, Nazeer Ahmed Gopang ( 2009 ) ‘Financial Crisis in South Asia and Its Impact on Poverty in Pakistan, a Case Study of Sindh by Using CGE-Model ‘ Journal of Academic Research in Economics Volume 1 Number 2 October 2009

Farrukh Saleem ( 2009 ) Pakistan and the Global Financial Crisis Center for Research & A ; Security Studies hypertext transfer protocol: //

Musleh ud Din ( 2009 ) ‘Global Fiscal Crisis: Deductions for Macroeconomic and Development Policies in Pakistan ‘ Webaddress:

Kumar, R. , and P. Vashisht. 2009. The Global Economic Crisis: Impact on India and Policy Responses. ADBI Working Paper 164. Tokyo: Asiatic Development Bank Institute. Available: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Dr. C. Rangarajan ( 2009 ) The International Financial Crisis and Its Impact on India Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training Lok Sabha, Parliament House New Delhi Webaddress:

Stabroek News ( August 2010 ) ‘How India survived the fiscal crisis ‘ hypertext transfer protocol: //

Ali Muhammad Mansoor ( 2009 ) ‘Global Fiscal Crisis: Impact on Pakistan and Policy Response ‘ UNDAP web site: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Butt Nauman Ayubi ( 2009 ) ‘Impact of Global fiscal crisis On Pakistan ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Usman Muhammad, ( 2009 ) ‘Global Financial Crisis Lessons For Pakistan ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Ali Arshad ( 2009 ) ‘The Impact of Financial Crisis on Pakistani Economy ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: // dataId=496

Mohan Rakesh ( 2008 ) ‘Global Financial Crisis and Key Risks: Impact on India and Asia ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Rajiv Kumar, Bibek Debroy, Jayati Ghosh, Vijay Mahajan, K. Seeta Prabhu ( 2009 ) ‘Global Fiscal Crisis: Impact on India ‘s Poor ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Sharma. V. K. , ( 2009 ) ‘The international fiscal crisis and India ‘ the impact, response and mentality ‘ webaddress:

Shrinivasan Rukmini ( 2010 ) ‘No fiscal crisis impact? India ‘s hapless grew by 34 manganeses ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Minar Pimple ( 2009 ) ‘Global fiscal crisis: deduction for Indian economic system ‘ webaddress: … /Global % 20Financial % 20Crisis % 20- % 20Implications % 20for % 20India ‘s % 20Development.pdf

Ratha.D ( 2009 ) ‘India is the top receiver of remittals ‘ webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //

Bhaskaran Manu, Ritwick Ghosh ( 2010 ) ‘Impact and Policy Responses ‘ ADB Report Webaddress: hypertext transfer protocol: //