Reflective Exercise: Inclusion in schools

A Brooding Exercise on the Theoretical and Practical Perspectives that Underlie Inclusion in Schools


My chosen subject is inclusion in schools. While I know that this is a hard and sometimes contested country, I believe that efforts should be made to happen some kind of standard that will place what might be considered best pattern in this country. I think that all kids, irrespective of their cultural background or physical/mental disablements, are entitled to be intervention and an instruction that empowers them and gets them ready to take their topographic point in society. I will hence be looking at some of the theoretical and practical positions on inclusion in instruction. I will look at those things that I believe most clearly reflect my ain values and thoughts on this affair. Following this reappraisal of theoretical positions I will plan a research proposal to look into what might be considered to be guidelines for effectual inclusive pattern in schools.

Inclusion in Schools

In a 1997 Government Green Paper ( DFEE ) the current authorities made clear that it aimed to guarantee that school criterions would be raised for kids who were defined as holding particular educational demands. This was seen as a move towards the greater inclusion of kids with particular educational demands in mainstream schools. In add-on to this, the progressively diverse and multi-faith nature of British society has raised Government concern that the instruction system non merely reflect the diverseness with our society but that there should be a move towards more inclusive instruction. But what might that imply? The Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education defines it in the undermentioned manner:

kids – with and without disablements or troubles – larning together in ordinary pre-school proviso, schools, colleges and universities with appropriate webs of support. Inclusion means enabling students to take part in the life and work of mainstream establishments to the best of their abilities, whatever their demands. There are many different ways of accomplishing this. An inclusive timetable might look different for each kid.[ 1 ]

Inclusion is increasing engagement for the greatest figure while defying segregation and schools range across spectrum of these issues. So so inclusive instruction should affect an appraisal of what is needed to run into the diverse demands of all vulnerable and marginalised groups. This would cover kids with disablements or particular educational demands, every bit good as those whose state of beginning or cultural background differs from the dominant host community.. Billington ( 2000:2-3 ) maintains that this involves an appraisal of what is needed to guarantee that all these groups are provided with the appropriate agencies of making their full potency. Billington ( 2000 ) nevertheless, maintains that discourses on inclusion tend to function institutional and governmental involvements instead than the involvements of the kid and that some particular demands kids are stigmatised by such discourses. Bird ( 2003 ) has argued that inclusive instruction is a complex procedure due to the fact that it has to get by with the complex and multi-faceted issues of exclusion. These issues are frequently generational and Billington ( 2000 ) is of the sentiment that this leads to resistance to inclusion as it is seen as a pathologising of difference.

Irving et Al ( 2000, p.176 ) maintain that there should be political acknowledgment of diverseness and difference as a legitimate constituent of British life. In order to accomplish the full inclusion of all kids, they maintain, there is a demand for a cardinal re-appraisal of attitudes and values in instruction. Inclusion is a human rights issue and the 1998 Human Rights Act is meant to turn to inequalities and prejudiced pattern peculiarly in relation to spiritual freedom. Under the footings of the 1998 Act, chools have a responsibility to guarantee that instruction is provided without gender, racial, or spiritual favoritism. They besides have a general responsibility to advance equality of chance and good relationships between different cultural and spiritual groups. Schools should supply a balanced and differentiated course of study for all kids. It has frequently been argued that instruction is an facet of socialization which involves the acquisition of accomplishments and cognition. Education helps to determine children’s moral beliefs and values, and should try to make this in ways which take history of children’s diverse demands.

Clearly inclusion in schools is a extremely complex and sometimes contested issue that requires farther research. It is non ever clear merely precisely what a individual means when they talk of inclusion in schools i.e. what standard is used to measure whether or non a school is being inclusive in its pattern every bit good as its doctrine. This is inline with my ain values that instruction should be every bit available to all and that there should be some nationally accepted apprehension of what inclusion in schools really means. While there are some indexs in National Standards and different facets of statute law etc. there is no common model by which to place what constitutes inclusive pattern. This research so, purposes to measure what might be the standards for measuring whether or non a school is prosecuting in inclusive and empowering pattern.

The purposes of this research are as follows:

  • To measure the apprehension in schools of current anti-discriminatory statute law
  • To detect how schools perceive of themselves in footings of inclusive pattern
  • To look into whether such pattern empowers or disempowers those who are regarded as in demand of being included

In prosecuting these purposes this undertaking hopes to accomplish some elements of pattern that might be regarded as grounds of an inclusive school. With this in head it might so be possible to detect what could be considered to be some illustrations of inclusive pattern.


This research will take a assorted methods attack to detecting what might be considered acceptable standards for inclusive pattern in schools. Bryman ( 2004 ) is of the sentiment that a assorted methods attack ( i.e. the usage of both quantitative and qualitative informations ) in research can sometimes give a more rounded image. Data that is obtained from questionnaire studies can sometimes turn out to be overly general in nature and in recent old ages at that place has been more of a inclination to follow a study with interviews based on the findings of the questionnaires. This research so will get down with a study of schools in this part and so pull on the findings from that study to set about a few, selected interviews to place apprehensions of best pattern for inclusion in schools.


Time restraints mean that there has to be a bound to the figure of schools surveyed. It is hence expected that the best attack would be to utilize a graded sample where every 3rd baby’s room, primary, and secondary school in the part would have a questionnaire to be filled in by the caput of school or their appointed representative. Questions would include whether the school had an equal chances policy with respect to employment. Whether it monitored classs of students e.g. figure of male childs and misss, kids with particular educational demands, kids with disablements and kids from minority cultural groups. There would besides be a inquiry on how frequently this monitoring was reviewed-once a term for illustration would be regarded as better pattern than one time a twelvemonth. There would besides be inquiries on how the school attended to the particular demands that kids might hold, whether there was proper entree for kids or their carers, who used wheelchairs, whether there were appropriate steps in topographic point for kids with disablements to hold entree to all countries of the school. There would besides be inquiries on how the school addressed cultural diverseness and whether this was apparent in the school literature and on wall shows.

Data Retrieval and Analysis

Respondents would be asked to return questionnaires within seven yearss, there would so be some clip allowed for trailing up late answers. It is anticipated that there should be a 50 or 60 % return. The information would be entered into XL spreadsheets and saloon charts produced. Once the information was analysed so a representative from one school at each degree would be asked to take part in a short interview. It is hoped that the study consequences, along with the interview consequences would give sufficient informations to bring forth suggested standards for measuring inclusive pattern nationally.

Ethical motives

In conformity with ethical guidelines participants would foremost be approached by telephone and so this would be followed up with a missive explicating the intents of the research more to the full and inquiring them to make full in the questionnaire. The schools involved and the instructors would stay anon. . Interviewees would besides be granted namelessness. All participants will be informed that the research is merely being used in an academic context. If they want to retreat from the undertaking at any clip they are at autonomy to make so and any informations refering them will non be used.


Billington, T. 2000Separating Losing and Excluded Children: Narratives of Difference,Maestro Classs in Education Series, London: Routledge Falmer

Bryman A 2004Social Research MethodsOxford, Oxford University Press

Giddens, A. 2001 4Thursdayerectile dysfunction.SociologyCambridge, Polity Press

Irving, B. , Barker, V. , Parker-Jenkins, M. and Hartas D. 2000 “In chase of societal justness, calling counsel proviso for Muslim misss in England”reappraisal Espanola De Orientacion Y Psicopedagogia11 ( 20 ) pp 175-186

Undertaking Social Exclusion: Taking stock and looking to the hereafter – emerging findings, March 2004, Social Exclusion Unit. ( quoted in Bird, 2004:3 hypertext transfer protocol: // Bird 2004

. ( http: // )

hypertext transfer protocol: //

hypertext transfer protocol: //