The Environmental Problems Of Wastewater Environmental Sciences Essay

Water constitutes over 70 % of the Earth ‘s surface and is a really of import resource for all people and the environment. If H2O gets polluted, it loses its value to us economically and aesthetically and can go a menace to our wellness, to aquatic life and to the wild life that depend on it.

Rivers and watercourses polluted with chemical contaminations account as one of the most important environmental problems.. Although some sorts of H2O pollution can happen through natural procedures, it is largely a consequence of human activities. We use H2O daily in our places and industries. The H2O we use is taken from lakes and rivers and from belowground ( groundwater ) ; and after we have used it and contaminated it, most of it returns to these locations.This used H2O is called “ effluent ” .If it is non treated before being discharged into waterways, serious pollution is the consequence. Turning population and rapid industrialization has increased the volume of effluent manifold finally deteriorating the fresh H2O resources and environing environment due to inappropriate direction.

Wastewater is a combination of liquid or water-carried waste removed from abodes, establishments ; commercial and industrial constitutions, together with land H2O, surface H2O and storm H2O. It by and large contains a high burden of O demanding wastes, infective or disease-causing agents, organic stuffs, foods that stimulate works growing, inorganic chemicals, minerals and deposits. It may besides incorporate toxic compounds. It is 99.94 per centum H2O, with merely 0.06 per centum of the effluent being dissolved and suspended solid stuff.

Effluent may be classified into four classs:

Domestic: effluent discharged from abodes and commercial establishments and similar installations ;

Industrial: effluent in which industrial waste predominates ;

Infiltration/inflow: immaterial H2O that enters the cloaca system through indirect and direct agencies such as through leaking articulations, clefts, or porous walls.Inflow is storm H2O that enters the cloaca system from storm drain connexions, roof headings, foundation and cellar drains or through manhole screens ;

Storm H2O: overflow ensuing from deluging due to rainfall.

The first two classs, domestic and industrial are non wholly dissociable.

Features: Fresh, aerophilic, domestic H2O has been said to hold the smell of kerosine or newly turned earth.Aged, infected sewerage is well more violative to the olfactory nerves.The characteristic rotten-egg smell of H sulphide and the mercaptans is declarative of infected sewage.Fresh sewerage is typically gray in colour.septic sewerage is black.The category of chemical compounds found in effluent are illimitable and so they are better known by the name of the trial used to mensurate them which are BOD5 and COD test.Industrial procedures generate a broad assortment of effluent pollutants.The charcteristics and degrees of pollutants vary significantly from industry to industry.

Waste-water quality is assessed based on physical, chemical, and biological features. Physical parametric quantities include coloring materials, smell, temperature, and turbidness. Insoluble contents such as solids, oil and lubricating oil, are to be considered under this category.. Solids may be farther subdivided into suspended and dissolved solids every bit good as organic ( volatile ) and inorganic ( fixed ) fractions. Chemical factors to be considered are: biochemical O demand ( BOD ) , chemical O demand ( COD ) , entire organic C ( TOC ) , and entire O demand ( TOD ) . Inorganic chemical parametric quantities include salt, hardness, pH, sourness and alkalinity, every bit good as concentrations of ionised metals such as Fe and manganese, and anionic entities such as chlorides, sulphates, sulphides, nitrates and phosphates. Bacteriological parametric quantities include coliforms, faecal coliforms, specific pathogens, and viruses. Both components and concentrations vary with clip and local conditions.

.

.

VARYING FLOW Issue:

Waste-water flow fluctuates with fluctuations in H2O use, which is affected by a battalion of factors including clime, community size, life criterions, dependableness and quality of H2O supply, H2O preservation demands or patterns, and the extent of metre services, in add-on to the grade of industrialization, cost of H2O and supply force per unit area. Wide fluctuations in effluent flow rates may therefore be expected to happen within a community

Table: Variation IN WASTE-WATER FLOW WITHIN A COMMUNITY

Community size ( population )

Variation in effluent flow ( per centum of the mean day-to-day flow rate )

1000

20-400

1000-10000

50-300

10000-100000

Upto 200

Beginning: Adapted from D.H.F. Liu and B.G. Liptak, Wastewater Treatment ( Boca Raton: Lewis, 1999 ) .

Effluent does non flux into a municipal effluent intervention works at a changeless rate.The flow rate varies from hr to hour.In most metropoliss, the form of day-to-day activities sets the form of sewerage flow and strength.Above-average sewerage flows and strength occur in mid-morning.The invariably altering sum and strength of effluent to be treated makes efficient procedure operation difficult.Also, many intervention units must be designed for the maximal flow conditions encountered which really consequences in their being oversized for mean conditions.Flow equalisation is non a intervention procedure in itself, but a technique that can be used to better the effectivity of both secondary and advanced effluent intervention processes.The intent of flow equalisation is to stifle the fluctuations so that the effluent can be treated at a about changeless flow rate.Flow equalisation can significantly better the public presentation of an bing works and increase its utile capacity.In new workss, flow equalisation can cut down the size and cost of the intervention units.

Flowrate and Mass Loading:

Wastewater provender is non specified, therefore the works must be able to handle whatever the effluent contains

Plant design will take history of historical flows and burdens, but must besides be able to cover with enlargement

Plant must besides be able to cover with a scope of flow and load conditions, plus peak upstream flow conditions ( eg storms )

Choice of Design Flowrates:

Domestic: based on a flow per caput. Varies between states

Industrial: Based on records of discharge consents and of metered supplies

Infiltration/Exfiltration: based on a % of the domestic flow

Top outing Factors: Depends on size of community

Upstream Flow Equalisation

UK upper limit flow to intervention works is determined by Formula A:

Formula A = PG+E+I+1360P+2E l/d

P=population

G=average day-to-day ingestion per caput l/h/d

E=Industrial & A ; commercial discharges to sewer l/d

I=infiltration l/d

Wastewater intervention options may be classified into groups of procedures harmonizing to the map they perform and their complexness:

The chief end of handling metropolis effluent was merely to cut down its content of suspended solids, oxygen-demanding stuffs, dissolved inorganic compounds and harmful bacteria.In recent old ages, nevertheless, more emphasis has been placed on bettering agencies of disposal of the solid residues from the municipal intervention process.The basic methods of handling municipal effluent autumn into the undermentioned phases which is shown in the signifier of block flow:

The procedure flow diagram of a basic effluent intervention procedure is as follows:

Conventional WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES:

Traditional effluent intervention consists of a combination of physical, chemical and biological procedures and operations to take solid & A ; dissolved organic affair and sometimes foods from wastewater.General footings used to depict different grades of intervention in order of increasing intervention degree are preliminary, primary, secondary and third and/or advanced effluent intervention.

Preliminary intervention:

Preliminary intervention prepares waste-water influent for farther intervention by cut downing or extinguishing

non-favourable waste-water features that might otherwise impede operation or overly increase care of downstream procedures and equipment. These features include big solids and shreds, scratchy grit, smells, and, in certain instances, intolerably high extremum hydraulic or organic burdens. Preliminary intervention processes consist of physical unit operations, viz. testing and comminution for the remotion of dust and shreds, grit remotion for the riddance of coarse suspended affair, and floatation for the remotion of oil and lubricating oil. Other preliminary intervention operations include flow equalisation, septage handling, and odour control methods.

Primary Treatment:

Primary intervention is designed to take organic and inorganic solids by the physical procedures of deposit and floatation.Approximately 25-50 % of the incoming biochemical O demand ( BOD5 ) ,50-70 % of the sum suspended solids ( SS ) , and 65 % of the oil and lubricating oil are removed during primary treatment.Some organic N, organic P and heavy metals associated with solids are besides removed during primary deposit, but colloidal and dissolved components are non affected.The wastewater from primary deposit units is referred to as primary wastewater.

Secondary intervention:

The intent of secondary intervention is the remotion of soluble and colloidal organics and suspended solids that have escaped the primary intervention. This is typically done through biological procedures, viz. intervention by activated sludge, fixed-film reactors, or laguna systems and deposit.

Developments IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT METHODS:

.

Developments to the old methods are made based on the necessity of intervention and fresh procedures are designed to bring forth an wastewater of higher quality than usually achieved by secondary intervention processes or incorporating unit operations non usually found in secondary treatment.so the types of advanced effluent intervention methods are

divided into three major classs by the type of procedure flow strategy utilised:

Third intervention

Physicochemical intervention

Combined biological -physical intervention

Third intervention may be defined as any intervention procedure in which unit operations are added to the flow strategy following conventional secondary treatment.Additions to conventional secondary intervention could be every bit simple as the add-on of a filter for suspended solids remotion or every bit complex as the add-on of many unit processes for organic, suspended solids, N and phosphorus removal.Physicochemical intervention is defined as a intervention procedure in which biological and physical-chemical procedures are intermixed to accomplish the coveted effluent.Combined biological-physical-chemical intervention is differentiated from third intervention in that in third intervention any unit procedures are added after conventional biological intervention, while in combined intervention, biological and physicochemical interventions are assorted.

Another manner to sort advanced effluent intervention is to distinguish on the footing of coveted intervention goals.Advanced effluent intervention is used for:

Additional organic and suspended solids remotion

Removal of nitrogen-bearing O demand ( NOD )

Food remotion

Removal of toxic stuffs.

In many, if non most cases today, conventional secondary intervention gives equal BOD and suspended solids removals.But advance effluent intervention is necessary because advanced effluent intervention works wastewaters may be recycled straight or indirectly to increase the available domestic H2O supply.

Biological intervention options There are three basic classs of bio logical intervention: aerobic, anaerobiotic and anoxic. Aerobic biological dainty ment, which may follow some signifier of pretreatment such as oil remotion, involves reaching effluent with bugs and O in a reactor to optimise the growing and efficiency of the biomass. The microorganisms act to catalyse the oxidization of biodegradable organics and other contaminations such as ammonium hydroxide, bring forthing innocuous by merchandises such as C dioxide, H2O, and extra biomass ( sludge ) . Anaerobic ( without O ) and an

oxic ( oxygen deficient ) interventions are similar to aerobic intervention, but use mi croorganisms that do non necessitate the add-on of O. These micro-organisms use the compounds other than O to catalyse the oxidization of biodegradable organics and other contaminations, ensuing in innocuous byproducts. The three single types of biological-treatment engineerings: aerobic, anaerobic or anoxic can be run in combination or in sequence to offer greater degrees of intervention. Regardless of the type of system selected, one of the keys to effectual biological intervention is to develop and keep an acclimated, healthy biomass, sufficient in measure to manage maximal flows and the orA­ganic tonss to be treated. Keeping the needed population of “ workers ” in a bioreactor is accomplished in one of two general ways:

aˆ? Fixed movie procedures: microorganA­isms are held on a surface, the fixed movie, which may be nomadic or stationA­ary with effluent fluxing past the surface/media. These procedures are designed to actively reach the bioA­film with the effluent and with O, when needed

aˆ? Suspended growing procedures: bioA­mass is freely suspended in the effluent and is assorted and can be aerated by a assortment of devices that transfer O to the bioreactor conA­tents

It is besides possible to unite both methA­ods in a individual reactor for more effectual intervention.

FIXED FILM PROCESSES: The description of Trickling filters and Revolving Biological Filters are shown in the tabular array below:

Procedure

Description

TRICKLING Filters

Biotowers, or dribbling filters as they are frequently called, consist of a bed of media in a armored combat vehicle. Wastewater fluxing into the biotower may hold gone through an earlier intervention measure to take oil and coarse or settleable solids. Rotary distributer weaponries or fixed noses are used to spray the pretreated effluent over the surface of the media. The H2O so trickles downward through the bed. Air circulates upward through the media as treated H2O is removed by an underdrain system. As the effluent trickles downward through the bed, a biological sludge of bugs develops on the surface of the media. Continuous flow provides the needed contact between the bugs and the organics. As the sludge bed gets thicker, it on occasion sloughs off of the media surface, necessitating settling to take the sloughed biosolids.While biotowers by and large are less efficient at remotion of BOD and COD than other engineerings, they do generA­ate really small sludge and have a really low potency for depriving volatile organic compounds ( VOC ) . Low VOC depriving possible can be an advantage for environmental grounds.

.The typical flow diagram for Trickling filters is shown below the tabular array.

ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTRACTOR ( RBC )

A revolving biological contractor ( RBC ) is an attached-growth biological procedure that consists of one or more basins in which big closely-spaced handbill discs mounted on horizontal shafts rotate easy through waste-water. The discs, which are made of high-density polystyrene or polyvinyl chloride ( PVC ) , are partly submerged in the waste-water, so that a bacterial sludge bed signifiers on their wetted surfaces. As the discs rotate, the bacteriums are exposed alternately to waste-water, from which they adsorb organic affair, and to air, from which they absorb O. The rotary motion besides allows extra bacteriums to be removed from the surfaces of the discs and maintains a suspension of sloughed biological solids. A concluding clarifier is needed to take sloughed solids. Organic affair is degraded by agencies of mechanisms similar to those operating in the trickling filters procedure. Partially submerged RBCs are used for carbonous BOD remotion, combined C oxidization and nitrification, and nitrification of secondary wastewaters. Wholly submerged RBCs are used for denitrification. A typical agreement of RBCs is shown in block flow diagram below the tabular array. In general, RBC systems are divided into a series of independent phases or compartments by agencies of baffles in a individual basin or separate basins arranged in phases. Compartmentalisation creates a plug-flow form, increasing overall remotion efficiency.It besides promotes a assortment of conditions where different beings can boom to changing grades. As the waste-water flows through the compartments, each subsequent phase receives inflowing with a lower organic content than the old phase ; the system therefore enhances organic remotion.

Typical FLOW DIAGRAM FOR TRICKLING Filters:

Synoptic of a intervention works with biological filter

Typical FLOW DIAGRAM FOR RBC:

Synoptic of a intervention with an RBC Diagram of the rule of an RBC

SUSPENDED GROWTH PROCESSES:

The activated-sludge procedure is an aerophilic, continuous-flow system in which a mixture of effluent and biological sludge ( micro-organism ) is agitated and aerated. The procedure consists of presenting clarified waste-water, after primary subsiding, into an aeration basin where it is assorted with an active mass of micro-organisms, chiefly bacteriums and Protozoa, which aerobically degrade organic affair into C dioxide, H2O, new cells, and other terminal merchandises. The bacteriums involved in activated sludge systems are chiefly 15 Gram-negative species, including C oxidants, N oxidants, floc formers and non-floc formers, and aerobes and facultative anaerobes. The Protozoa, for their portion, include mastigophorans, ameba and ciliophorans. An aerophilic environment is maintained in the basin by agencies of diffused or mechanical aeration, which besides serves to maintain the contents of the reactor ( or assorted spirits ) wholly assorted. After a specific keeping clip, the assorted spirits passes into the secondary clarifier, where the sludge is allowed to settle and a clarified wastewater is produced for discharge. The procedure recycles a part of the settled sludge back to the aeration basin to keep the needed activated sludge concentration The procedure besides deliberately

wastes a part of the settled sludge to keep the needed solids keeping clip ( SRT ) for effectual organic remotion.

Control of the activated-sludge procedure is of import to keep a high intervention public presentation degree

under a broad scope of operating conditions. The chief factors in procedure control are the undermentioned:

( a ) Care of dissolved O degrees in the aeration armored combat vehicles ;

( B ) Regulation of the sum of returning activated sludge ;

( degree Celsius ) Control of the waste activated sludge.

The chief operational job encountered in a system of this sort is sludge bulking, which can be

caused by the absence of P, N and hint elements and broad fluctuations in pH, temperature and dissolved O ( DO ) . Bulky sludge has hapless settleability and compactibility due to the inordinate growing of filiform microorganisms. This job can be controlled by chlorination of the return sludge.

Many alterations of the conventional activated sludge procedure have been developed to turn to specific intervention problems.A brief description of these procedures is given in the Annexe.

Option

Advantage

Biological FILTERS AND RBCs ( Biodisks )

Low energy ingestion

Simple operation necessitating less care and monitoring than the activated sludge technique.

Good settling features of the sludge

Lower sensitiveness to lade fluctuations and toxins than activated sludge

By and large adapted to little communities

Resistance to cold ( the discs are ever protected by goons or a little chamber ) .

ACTIVATED SLUDGE

Adapted to any size of community ( except really little 1s )

Good riddance of all the pollution parametric quantities ( SS, COD, BODs, N by nitrification and denitrification ) ;

Adapted to the protection of sensitive having countries.

Partially-stabilised sludge

Easy to implement coincident dephosphatation.

Performance is far better when compared to Biological filters and RBCs

Capital costs are less compared to Biological filters and RBCs.

Chemical Procedure:

Chemical procedures used in waste-water intervention are designed to convey about some signifier of alteration by agencies of chemical reactions. They are ever used in concurrence with physical unit operations and biological procedures. This can be a important factor if the waste-water is to be reused.This chief chemical unit processes, include chemical precipitation, surface assimilation, disinfection, dechlorination.

Method

Description

Chemical Precipitation

Chemical intervention utilizes a coagulator such as Fe or aluminium.Then solid organic affair and P are precipitated into larger pieces which are separated as sludge. Suspended solids removal through chemical intervention involves a series of three unit operations: rapid commixture, flocculation and subsiding. First, the chemical is added and wholly dispersed throughout the waste-water by rapid blending for 20-30 seconds in a basin with a turbine sociable. Coagulated atoms are so brought together via flocculation by automatically bring oning speed gradients within the liquid. Flocculation takes 15 to 30 proceedingss in a basin incorporating turbine or paddle-type sociables. The concluding measure is clarification by gravity.A once-through chemical intervention system is shown below the tabular array.

Advantage: greater remotion efficiency, the feasibleness of utilizing higher overflow rates, and more consistent public presentation. On the other manus, curdling consequences in a larger mass of primary sludge that is frequently more hard to inspissate and dewater. It besides entails higher operational costs and demands greater attending on the portion of the operator.

Adsorption WITH ACTIVATED CARBON

Adsorption is the procedure of roll uping soluble substances within a solution on a suited interface. In waste-water intervention, surface assimilation with activated carbon-a solid interface-usually follows normal biological intervention, and is aimed at taking a part of the staying dissolved organic matter.Particulate affair nowadays in the H2O may besides be removed.. The two most common types of activated C are farinaceous activated C ( GAC ) , which has a diameter greater than 0.1 millimeter, and powdered activated C ( PAC ) , which has a diameter of less than 200 mesh. A fixed-bed column is frequently used to convey the waste-water into contact with GAC. The H2O is applied to the top of the column and withdrawn from the underside, while the C is held in topographic point. Backwashing and surface lavation are applied to restrict headloss build-up. A schematic of an activated carboncontactor is shown below the tabular array. Expanded-bed and moving-bed C contactors have been developed to get the better of the job of headloss build-up.

Advantage: Exploitation powdered activated C in concurrence with traditional biological intervention provides first-class outflowing bio-assay consequences, provides for toxicity control within the bioreactor, and proA­motes higher nitrification efficiency than that of a conventional activated-sludge system. PACT systems besides proA­vide a buffering consequence to floor or upset conditions, leting the intervention sysA­tem to retrieve rapidly or even go on intervention with small or no damaging effects. The usage of activated C besides decreases VOC emanations and improves COD remotion efficiency.

CWAO

Oxidation is a procedure widely used for effluent intervention by which the pollutants are removed or converted into more biodegradable substances. Catalytic moisture air oxidization ( CWAO ) is a liquid stage reaction between organic stuff in H2O and O. CWAO is an attractive intervention for waste watercourses, which are excessively dilute to incinerate and excessively concentrated for biological intervention. It can be defined as the oxidization of organic and inorganic substances in an aqueous solution or suspension

by agencies of O or air at elevated temperatures and force per unit areas. It is besides called flameless burning. CWAO is particularly effectual for wastes with a high organic affair that can non be removed by conventional intervention methods. Insoluble organic affair is converted to simpler soluble organic compounds which are in bend oxidized and finally converted to carbon dioxide and H2O, without emanations of NOx, SO2, HCl, dioxins, furans, fly ash, etc.Typical conditions for CWAO scope from 125 to 300a-¦C and at force per unit areas from 0.5 to 20 MPa. Residence times may alter from 15 to 120 min, and the chemical O demand ( COD ) remotion may typically be about 75-90 % .

DECHLORINATION

Dechlorination is the remotion of free and entire combined Cl residue from chlorinated effluent wastewater before its reuse or discharge to having Waterss. Chlorine compounds react with many organic compounds in the wastewater to bring forth unsought toxic compounds that cause long-run inauspicious impacts on the H2O environment and potentially toxic effects on aquatic microorganisms. Dechlorination may be brought approximately by the usage of activated C, or by the add-on of a cut downing agent such as sulfurdioxide ( SO2 ) , sodiumsulfite ( Na2SO3 ) orsodium metabisulfite ( Na2S2O5 ) .It is of import to observe that dechlorination will non take toxic byproducts that have already been produced

Beginning: Adapted from Liu and Liptak, Wastewater Treatment

Beginning: Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering, 3rd edition.

Comparison OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN WASTEWATER:

Factor

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

CHEMICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL

EFFLUENT QUALITY

Biological P remotion was observed to make a lower limit of 0.4mg/l in the wastewater

Chemical P remotion was observed to make whatever outflowing quality demand as more and more chemicals are dosed

SLUDGE PRODUCTION ( The production of sludge is considered as a really of import factor in the pick of a effluent intervention method presents )

Sludge production is less compared to chemical method.

Chemical P remotion produces more sludge, approximately 25 % more sludge than by biological agencies.

NEEDED PLANT VOLUME

As the volume of the anaerobiotic zone of the Bio -P procedure is reduced, there are alterations in the outflowing quality and the efficiency of P remotion is reduced

The decrease of the volume of the anaerobiotic zone has no effects on the chemical P remotion

Consumption OF ENERGY

It was possible to cut down the capacity of the aeration device down to 1000kg O2/hr and still hold good intervention consequences in footings of COD and nitrogen remotion in the Bio-P process.Beyond this bound ( less than 100kg O2/hr ) COD and the Nitrogen in the wastewater are excessively high.

Same sum of COD and Nitrogen in the wastewater is observed at 500kgO2/hr.So chemical method is more immune to decrease in aeration capacity than the Bio-P procedure by atleast 500kgO2/hr aeration capacity.

ECONOMIC COST OF TREATMENT )

Annual cost for sludge disposal is saved by Bio-P compared to chemical method.

The cost of buying chemicals is high and no nest eggs with respect to sludge disposal compared to Bio-P remotion.

The economic cost of intervention has been evaluated based on a summing up of the single costs associated with sludge production, cost of chemicals, energy cost and costs associated to volume nest eggs. The purpose of an economic cost is non to reflect the exact fiscal cost but an estimation that could be used as a guideline for the building of a new works or for comparing of the two procedures.

Decision: It is non a good thought to province that any intervention method is better than the other.Each one has its ain advantages and disadvantages.The pick of which method is to be used will depend on the society, the discharge demands and the costs they are ready to incur.As a concluding decision, the winning construct these yearss should non be based on which procedure should be used in isolation to the other, but instead utilizing the advantages of both processes together to obtain best consequences, while at the same clip minimising their advantages.

Discussion:

Chemical VS BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT:

In Biological intervention, micro-organisms feed on the available organic matter.These beings proliferate and the excess is separated as sludge.Air is blown into the H2O to prolong the bacteriums whereas chemical intervention utilizes a coagulator such as Fe or aluminum and so solid organic affair and P are separated as sludge.Chemical precipitation cleans the H2O really quickly, say in less than 15mins after the induction of the procedure we have clean H2O, whereas with biological intervention it will take 3 hour to accomplish the same.Biological procedure stopping points relatively long clip and is dependent on the effectivity of the microorganisms.Chemical and Biological interventions work in different ways and accomplish different consequences.

The Key to Future Wastewater Treatment

In recent old ages, the usage of membrane bioreactor ( MBR ) engineering for effluent intervention has grown dramatically. An MBR is a intercrossed procedure in which a biological effluent intervention procedure is combined straight with a membrane procedure. The chief undertaking of the membrane within this procedure is to divide the treated wastewater from the biomass, retaining suspended solids and bacteriums. Membranes available today carry through this demand good.

The 2nd undertaking of the membranes is to ever keep an economic permeate flux.

Investing costs for MBR workss are frequently lower than those of conventional effluent intervention workss.

However, MBR operating costs are still higher than most conventional workss. In the hereafter, these costs will be reduced by optimising the full system, and MBR engineering will supply three chief advantages compared with conventional engineering:

Better outflowing quality ;

Approximately half the foot- print ; and

Lower overall lifecycle costs. With this mentality, MBR engineering will be the cardinal engineering for future effluent intervention.